A few posts back, I was trying to merge a Polaroid with a Diana. The results were disappointing. The focal length of the Diana is just to small to cover the entire Polaroid frame. Plus, I was having exposure problems. Well, working with a different toy camera, I solved both problems.
The camera I used instead of the Diana was the "Continental", probably the crappiest camera I've ever used. I got it at Savers for $3. The shutter was really inconsistent, sometimes firing, sometimes not, sometimes staying open. I figured I wasn't ever going to use it again. So, looking at it, I considered the fact that it made such large exposures on a 120 roll, the image should spread further across a Polaroid print. The focal length is 88mm, which is less than a Polaroid camera, but more than a Diana.
What the heck, might as well try, right? So I tore it apart (which really only involved removing eight screws from the front). I spent about 30 minutes trying to figure out how to get the shutter working properly. Eventually, I just bent up a little piece that seems to be catching on another little piece. That fixed it! I still have to push it firmly and quickly, or it will lag, but it works. I had to use some cardboard to bring the focal length to 88mm. Conveniently, the last one I had made for a pinhole was exactly the correct length (!!). Nice. Taped it all together with my Propack back, simple, but effective. So, may I present the very ugly "Polaroid Continental"...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db2a7/db2a71afb42216039266250ca7dc61c937063e9c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4adc7/4adc7ca39c70e573475ea9497585941b252d7894" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bc05/7bc05e14f95ce949035e30d94339554cfe112ce8" alt=""
Hideous! Owell, no beauty queen, but still has hillbilly charm. Here is the back of the camera. You can see the ultra large image frame. I'm probably going to turn this part into a 127 film slicer this summer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69e6c/69e6ce0728ed127ef0ac7293f5154f73e370ddc7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4d30/a4d3010288f87a883a8d156e890cfd1ce9c50ec6" alt=""
First film I tried was UV-ID, which has an ISO of 75. This is the same color film I tried in my Dianaroid, but it wouldn't expose properly. Same problem with the Continental.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b967/7b967336f97be3f90e735e839a7d4ab4e63a7dc9" alt=""
Okay, so I went to the opposite extreme and used Type 667, which is ISO 3000. Overexposed, of course. Though the goop actually worked well.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b17a/5b17a7a16788d397b7536e701a80930812ca069c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/530a0/530a00986207ef50c1f715e8b43ef64e79d87356" alt=""
So you notice that YES, the image does cover the entire Polaroid! And it is generally in focus, as in not a complete blur. Success! Sweetness. But that darn exposure. Well, how about 667 inside? Maybe less light would allow for proper exposure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba869/ba869b8b5bb9713097fad277cb5f209946892b72" alt=""
Guess not. That was the last shot on that pack, so I grabbed another black-and-white pack that I had in another camera. I thought it was 667. Took it outside, figured I'd try again, in case it was just the shutter acting funky. This is what I got:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf41f/cf41fd903047fcac62972342c9044b7fe7464253" alt=""
Yipes! That's not 667! That's 664! Type 664 has an ISO of 100. Well, there you go. And it makes complete sense, as most toy cameras seem to have a shutter speed of about 1/100th of a second. Problem solved. I now have a working toy Polaroid camera.
So, today I wanted to use this bad boy. Drove to the west side of Phoenix, to the White Tank Mountains. I had dreams of hiking up a mountain and shooting with my different cameras. Bugs! I mean, seriously. Bugs. There were soooo many gnats, I made it about half a mile through the desert before I had to turn around. I was pretty close to flipping out. I would have taken slow, deep breaths to calm down, but I would have sucked a bunch of gnats into my lungs. I was covered with the things. Here is a shot of them on my truck (shot with my SX-70). These were the smaller gnats. There were really big gnats sticking all over my arms and legs...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0221/a0221a9a0f84620e635f764fa065520f1571c207" alt=""
So much for that idea. I did get a few shots, and I did drive around for a couple of hours taking pictures of the fields and desert and such. Probably got around 10 shots from the Continental. I think it works exceptionally well. It definitely has a sweet area of focus...around five or six feet. After that, all is a blur. Still get some nifty blurry distant shots.
Enough talk! More pictures!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44275/442757f22d5d796b045be90582361cd11cd001ae" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2cee/b2cee64cdcfab8f7e6fce0036d41d19ff25b102a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd0b5/bd0b57360e8c6cadf814ec3da4e4dffd6e3b5a54" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48da6/48da684ae149edc7da81cf01c729b25279249863" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c61b2/c61b2f59937f4dffb74e3deb116b44d532abbe1a" alt=""
Very nice. A bit of warp, a bit of vignette and blur. It has a much wider angle than a normal Polaroid lens...almost pinhole-like, except with blur. Very toycam. Here are a couple shots from beyond the realms of focus.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39d1f/39d1f4a644d562e4554ad64af69b47c03c81f149" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f771/1f771703c7709dc214e7b87b99996cf530706bf2" alt=""
It's almost impossible to shoot a level photo using the Propack viewfinder. It always tilts. I've read some other complaints about this. I may just pop out the glass and use the plastic frame as a viewfinder, maybe make crosshairs.
Still, I'm thrilled that it works. They have a nice, vintage quality to them.
The next step may be to make it a bit sturdier. Build a better frame and seal it with something better than electrical tape. I want to try some 100 ISO color film in it next...690 or Fuji FP-100C.
I just got a Polaroid 102 in the mail....and a correction from my previous post: all of the folding Polaroid cameras focus. It's the same style as my 195, with the slide bars on top of the bellows. I'll post more on the 102 after I get some batteries working in it and shoot some with it. Until next time, doods.
Awesome! It's definitely a keeper, the shots are sweet!
ReplyDelete"no beauty queen, but still has hillbilly charm" best sentence ever.
ReplyDeleteI found your blog a few days ago, and now I'm obsessed - all I can think about is buying junk cameras and tearing them apart to make new hybrid monsters. Anyway, just wanted to say that your blog has been very inspiring! :)
ReplyDeleteYou think this camera is hideous? I think you will get a lot of new friends if you go out with that thing. Better than digital cameras with an artificial shutter sound. Hate those!
ReplyDelete